Following the devastating Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 innocent lives, including a foreigner, India is engulfed in grief and anger, demanding accountability. Evidence points to militant groups across the border orchestrating the attack. In response, India’s Cabinet Committee on Security launched a firm 5-point plan against Pakistan, including suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, expelling military advisers, visa bans, border closures, and “Operation Sindoor.”
Yet, amid this firm stance, India is still set to face Pakistan in the upcoming Asia Cup cricket match — a contradiction that raises political, ethical, and emotional questions. Earlier, bilateral cricket ties were suspended citing terrorism and national sentiment, based on the belief that cricket cannot continue with a nation accused of supporting terror. Although the Legends League match was canceled post-attack, the Asia Cup match proceeds, justified by ICC schedules and contracts.
However, India has previously withdrawn from trade deals and diplomatic events over security concerns. Why not from a cricket match? Allowing this game undermines India’s diplomatic isolation strategy, disrespects victims’ families, and confuses citizens. If Pakistan won’t act against terror groups, their cricket team can’t be seen as neutral. India must align its words and actions and refuse to play until terrorism ends.
